Murray Waas articles in New York Magazine

Home
National Journal: "Why Rove Testified for a Firth Time"
Naitonal Journal: "CIA Leak Prosecutor Focuses on Libby"
National Journal: "Senate Ethics Commitee Clears Shelby"
Naitonal Journal: "Is There a Double Standard on Leaks?"
National Journal: "Rove Assured Bush He Was Not Leaker"
ABC News: "DOJ Official Fired in Wake of ABC News Investigation"
Los Angles Times: "Bleak House"
Los Angeles Times: "Despite Ban, U.S. Arms are Sold to Pakistan"
Los Angeles Times: "U.S. Knew Pakistan Arms Sales Broke Law, Pell Charges"
Los Angeles Times: "Iraq Got U.S. Technology After CIA Warned Baker"
Los Angeles Times: "U.S. Paying Off Bad Iraqi Debt"
Los Angeles Times: "Bush Had Long History in Support of Iraq Aid"
Boston Globe: "Lawyers Battle Over Iran-contra Final Report"
National Journal: "Secret Service Records Prompted Judith Miller to Change Testimony"
National Journal: "Internal Affairs"
National Journal: "Secret Order by Gonzales Granted Extraordinary Power to Aides"
Naitonal Journal: "What Bush Was Told About Iraq"
Naitonal Journal "Key Intelligence Briefing Kept from Congress"
National Journal "Insulating Bush"
National Journal: "Cheney Authorized Libby to Leak Classified Information"
National Journal: "Justice Aide Says He Was Directed to Call Proseucutors"
Washington Post: "A Favor for a Felon"
Los Angeles Times: "High-Tech Aid Flowed As Iraq Built Up Forces"
Los Angeles Times: "U.S. Bent Aid Rules to Gain Turkey's Help In Gulf War"
Washington Post: "Noriega: A Probe That Fizzled"
Los Angeles Times: "Special Counsel Sought on Aid to Iraq"
L.A.Times: "U.S. to OK High-Tech Sales to Iran and Syria"
Boston Globe: "Reagan Tapes Iran-contra Testimony"
"National Journal: "Administration Withheld Emails About Rove"
National Journal: "Cheney's Call"
Los Angeles Times : "Italian Report Suggests U.S. Knew of Bank's Loans for Iraqi Military"
Salon.com: "Clinton administration failed to monitor China's use of missile-technology exports"
Los Angeles Times: "Kuwait, Saudis Supplied Iraq with U.S. Arms"
Los Angeles Times: "Saudi Arms Link To Iraq Allowed"
ABC News "Bush White House Pushed Grant for Former Aid"
ABC News: "White House Involved in U.S. Attorney Firings"
The Hill: "Bush Administration Leaks Bolstered Renzi Reelecton Bid"
Los Angeles Times: "U.S. Loans Indirectly Financed Iraq Military"
Los Angeles Times: "Abuses in U.S. Aid to Iraq Ignored"
Los Angeles Times: "Bush Secret Effort Helped Iraq Build Its War Machine"
Washington Examiner: "The Baron's Last Exit"
Arkansas Times
The American Prospect "The Meeting"
Murray Waas articles on Talking Points Memo
Los Angels Times: : "U.S. Gave Intelligence Data to Iraq Three Months Before Invasion"
Los Angeles Times: "Bush Tied to `86 Bid To Give Iraq Milirary Advice"
Los Angles Times: "Jordan Gave Iraq Broad Military Assistance"
Village Voice: "While You Were Watching Katrina"
New Republic: "Media Specter"
Los Angeles Times: "Iraq Used American-Built Plant to Develop A-Arms"
Los Angeles Times: "Iraq's $5 Billion Windfall Spins Deepening Mystery"
Most recent stories
Murray Waas articles in Time Magazine
Murray Waas articles in the New Yorker
Murray Waas articles in the Nation
Huffington Post: "Former U.S. Attorney Condemns Bush"
Murray Waas articles in the American Prospect
Murray Waas articles in Village Voice
Murray Waas: Articles in the Atlantic
Los Angeles Times: "U.S. to OK High-Tech Sales to Iran and Syria"
Village Voice: "Jack Anderson: An Appreication"
Murray Waas: Articles in the Atlantic
Murray Waas articles in The New Republic
Murray Waas stories on Mike Huckabee
Articles on Justice Department grants programs
Exclusive: Cheney's Interiview with the Special Proseucotr
The United States v. I. Lewis Libby
Articles on prewar intelligence and the Fitzgerald Investigaton
Journalism Criticism by and About Murray Waas
Articles about U.S. Attorney Firings and Alberto Gonzales
Murray Waas articles in New York Magazine
Murray Waas biography

Alberto Gonzales Won't Be Charged Over Eavesdropping Testimony

Alberto Gonzales Won't Be Charged Over Eavesdropping Testimony

Photo: Getty Images

Alberto Gonzales, pilloried for allegedly misleading Congress about the Bush administration’s warrantless eavesdropping program, has been exonerated — sort of. According to public records and interviews with federal law-enforcement officials, the Justice Department has concluded that there’s insufficient evidence to bring criminal charges against the former attorney general. His critics might groan, but they have some solace: The Justice Department’s inspector general, who conducted the investigation, concluded that his testimony before Congress about the eavesdropping program was “confusing,” “incomplete,” and had the “effect of misleading” both Congress and the public. Surely Jon Stewart can do something with that.

Gonzales also remains under investigation by the Justice Department for matters connected to the wiretaps and the firings, thought to be politically motivated, of nine U.S. attorneys — scandal aplenty. But it’s been allegations about his eavesdropping testimony to the Senate Judiciary Committee that put him in the greatest legal jeopardy by far. A major reason he escaped criminal charges, according to people close to the investigation, was that he finally admitted what he never would have before, when he seemed the most loyal of George W. Bush’s servants: that many of his most controversial decisions (first as White House counsel, and later, as attorney general) in authorizing, overseeing, and concealing the eavesdropping program were done at the specific direction of the former president. In other instances, Gonzales and his attorneys argued that his actions were done in furtherance of the Bush administration’s policies — meaning, for what it’s worth, that he did not act with personal intent to do wrong.

“He was willing to be a lightning rod in the past for the president,” said one legal source close to the investigation. “He has done that during the entire course of his career. But it was pressed upon him that that was not going to work in this instance — and he did what he had to do.”

Ironically, in finally talking to investigators about the president, Gonzales might actually have been protecting his old boss, as well as himself. A senior Bush-administration official familiar with the matter told me that Fred Fielding, the White House counsel in the closing days of the Bush presidency, feared that the Justice Department’s probe of Gonzales’s misleading testimony might morph into a special prosecutor’s investigation not only of Gonzales, but also of the conduct of others in the Bush White House — including perhaps Bush himself. (The Justice Department can refer an investigation to the attorney general for a criminal or special prosecutor to take over.) Fielding quietly counseled Gonzales’s cooperation, and Gonzales’s legal team, headed by George J. Terwilliger III, a deputy attorney general during the presidency of the first President Bush, made an early decision to fully cooperate with the inspector general.

Fielding declined to comment for this article. But a former Bush-administration official who worked closely with him said Fielding called the possibility of a special prosecutor investigating the eavesdropping program “the nightmare scenario.” Gonzalez has pulled this feint before: One factor in his decision to resign in August 2007, senior Justice Department officials speculated at the time, was to avoid the appointment of a special prosecutor.

Bush’s “nightmare scenario” apparently averted, Gonzales remains under investigation by the Justice Department he once led for two matters: the firings of those nine U. S. attorneys, and — this should sound familiar — whether Gonzales and other government attorneys acted properly in authorizing and overseeing the eavesdropping program. (The latter case is being brought by the Justice Department’s Office of Professional Responsibility.) Little could be learned about those investigations, but it has long been widely believed that Gonzales’s most serious legal charges were the ones he now seems to have dodged. Give the guy credit — he’s a lawyer, after all.